From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golding v. DHS/ICE

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 12, 2021
20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-8679 (VSB)

07-12-2021

KARIM GOLDING, Plaintiff, v. DHS/ICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff filed this action pro se and is proceeding in forma pauperis. Defendant moved to dismiss the operative pleadings on March 22, 2021. (Doc. 38). On April 8, Plaintiff moved for appointment of counsel, (Doc. 43), but now appears to be seeking counsel with the help of an attorney representing him in a capacity separate from this action, (Doc. 46). Given this, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to inform the Court via letter no later than August 1, 2021 regarding whether he has been able to locate counsel.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to pro se Plaintiff and to Elizabeta Markuci, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, Inc., 151 West 30 Street 11

Floor, New York, NY 10001.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Golding v. DHS/ICE

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 12, 2021
20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Golding v. DHS/ICE

Case Details

Full title:KARIM GOLDING, Plaintiff, v. DHS/ICE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2021)