From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldberg v. Blustein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

May, 1914.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.


We think the plaintiff's attorney should have disclosed the address of his client. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.


Summaries of

Goldberg v. Blustein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Goldberg v. Blustein

Case Details

Full title:BETTY GOLDBERG, Respondent, v . DAVID BLUSTEIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1914

Citations

163 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)