From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldbeck v. Birkholz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 29, 2021
Case No. 21-CV-1054 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 21-CV-1054 (NEB/KMM)

06-29-2021

TODD GOLDBECK, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the May 13, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (ECF No. 10.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is ACCEPTED; and

2. Goldbeck's Petition (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 29, 2021

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goldbeck v. Birkholz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 29, 2021
Case No. 21-CV-1054 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Goldbeck v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:TODD GOLDBECK, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

Case No. 21-CV-1054 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2021)