From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gold v. Town of East Haddam

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 14, 2007
938 A.2d 592 (Conn. 2007)

Opinion

SC 18067

Decided December 14, 2007


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:.

"1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?

"2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?"

John S. Bennet, in support of the petition.

Leo Gold, in opposition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067.


Summaries of

Gold v. Town of East Haddam

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 14, 2007
938 A.2d 592 (Conn. 2007)
Case details for

Gold v. Town of East Haddam

Case Details

Full title:LEO GOLD ET AL. v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 14, 2007

Citations

938 A.2d 592 (Conn. 2007)
938 A.2d 592

Citing Cases

Gold v. Town of East Haddam

We granted certification to appeal limited to the following issues: (1) "Did the Appellate Court err in its…