From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 2, 1984
448 So. 2d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-2024.

March 20, 1984. Rehearing Denied May 2, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Dick C.P. Lantz, Judge.

Justin Edward Beals, Miami, for appellant.

Kreeger Kreeger and Julian Kreeger, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


The order dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution with prejudice is reversed upon a holding that: (a) the notice of taking a deposition constituted activity sufficient to preclude dismissal, Silverman v. Equifax Services, Inc., 420 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); (b) a dismissal for failure to prosecute may not be "with prejudice," McDaniel v. Onkey, 422 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Reversed.


Summaries of

Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 2, 1984
448 So. 2d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Gold Coast Graphics, Inc. v. Rachline

Case Details

Full title:GOLD COAST GRAPHICS, INC., APPELLANT, v. LESLIE RACHLINE AND DODI…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 2, 1984

Citations

448 So. 2d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Layne

The trial judge specified that dismissal was based on Jackson's failure to submit to the blood test and…

Ehrlich v. Hogle

This too was error. See Abu-Hamdeh ex rel. Abu-Hamdeh v. Romero-Bolumen, 889 So.2d 879, 880 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA…