From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golan v. Astuto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 29, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff sustained injuries to his face when he attempted to saw a branch of a tree that had fallen onto his property from the defendants' adjoining property. Where, as here, there is no evidence that the tree was defective or that the defendants had actual or constructive notice of any defective condition in the tree before it fell, the defendants did not have a duty to take reasonable steps to prevent any potential harm that may have occurred to the plaintiff on his property as a result of the tree falling on his property ( see, Ivancic v. Olmstead, 66 N.Y.2d 349, 350-351, cert denied 476 U.S. 1117; Harris v. Village of E. Hills, 41 N.Y.2d 446, 449).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Golan v. Astuto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Golan v. Astuto

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO GOLAN, Appellant, v. LUIGI ASTUTO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

Pulgarin v. Demonteverde

The plaintiff Jose F. Pulgarin was injured when a tree on the defendants' property fell onto the car that he…

McKeever v. City of Rye

The law requires that in order for the plaintiff to prevail on a claim, the evidence that supports his claim…