From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goins v. United Parcel Serv.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 26, 2024
21-cv-08722-PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-08722-PJH

02-26-2024

GALENA GOINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE LIMITS

RE: DKT. NO. 57

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants have filed an administrative motion seeking “the election to file more than one motion for summary judgment or one consolidated brief that exceeds page limits.” See Dkt. 57. Plaintiffs have filed an opposition to the motion. See Dkt. 58.

While the court DENIES defendants' request for an “election,” it GRANTS the request for defendants to exceed page limits. Defendants' motion and plaintiffs' opposition brief shall be limited to forty (40) pages, and defendants' reply brief shall be limited to thirty (30) pages. Absent a stipulation from the parties, the briefs shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3, with oppositions to be filed within 14 days of the motion, and the reply within seven days of the opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goins v. United Parcel Serv.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 26, 2024
21-cv-08722-PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Goins v. United Parcel Serv.

Case Details

Full title:GALENA GOINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 26, 2024

Citations

21-cv-08722-PJH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)