From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 29, 1996
673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-0717.

May 29, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Cynthia G. Angelos, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-2097 CFA.

Kenneth G. Goff, Arcadia, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987 within thirty days. See Weisman v. State, 651 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The motion in this case does not appear to be facially defective, but for the absence of verification, in its allegations with respect to appellant's plea agreement, counsel's representations to the court with respect to same and counsel's calculations as to sentence.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 29, 1996
673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Goff v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH G. GOFF, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 29, 1996

Citations

673 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Because the allegations contained in appellant's motion are otherwise legally sufficient, our affirmance is…

A. Troya v. State

We affirm the order denying Appellant's unsworn motion for post-conviction relief, but do so without…