From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godfrey v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 23, 2017
220 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D16–5714

06-23-2017

John GODFREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order authorizing involuntary medical treatment is affirmed as the requirements of section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2016), were proved by competent, substantial evidence. We note that order is not moot despite the fact that the 90–day period of treatment mandated by the order has expired. See Godwin v. State , 593 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1992), and Hills v. State , 699 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Godfrey v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 23, 2017
220 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Godfrey v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GODFREY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 23, 2017

Citations

220 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)