From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godbolt v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION
Oct 31, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-143 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-143 HTW-LRA

10-31-2013

RICKY GODBOLT PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court pursuant to United States Magistrate Judge Linda Anderson's Report and Recommendation which clearly notified the respective parties in the above-styled and numbered cause that failure to file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained therein within fourteen (14) days from the date of service would bar further appeal in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. § 636.

The Magistrate Judge recommended that this court adopt her Report and Recommendation and dismiss this matter without prejudice because petitioner has not exhausted his state law claims.

The petitioner has notified the court that he does not intend to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation because he acknowledges that he has not exhausted.

Accordingly, finding that all parties are in agreement on the matter of exhaustion, this court hereby dismisses this action without prejudice.

HENRY T. WINGATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Godbolt v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION
Oct 31, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-143 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Godbolt v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY GODBOLT PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-143 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. Oct. 31, 2013)