From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gochin v. Wall

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2012
No. 61 MM 2012 (Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 61 MM 2012

07-06-2012

DIANE GOCHIN, Petitioner v. JUDGE KELLY C. WALL, NORMAN ROSETSKY, RANDEE FELDMAN, ESQ., Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Application to Amend are DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Gochin v. Wall

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2012
No. 61 MM 2012 (Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Gochin v. Wall

Case Details

Full title:DIANE GOCHIN, Petitioner v. JUDGE KELLY C. WALL, NORMAN ROSETSKY, RANDEE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 61 MM 2012 (Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)