Summary
noting that claimant's improvement after treatment may provide substantial evidence to discount a treating physician's opinion
Summary of this case from Berg v. SaulOpinion
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00123-MP-WCS.
February 26, 2010
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation, Doc. 20, regarding the Complaint, Doc. 1. The Magistrate Judge has recommended the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed. The plaintiff has not objected, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 20, is ADOPTED and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is AFFIRMED.DONE AND ORDERED.