Opinion
2015-1620
04-08-2016
OSRAM GMBH, Appellant v. E. FRED SCHUBERT, Appellee
CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC. DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M. BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON; JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-00459.
JUDGMENT
CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC. DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M. BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON; JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2016
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court