From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glover v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 8, 2002
816 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-4757.

May 8, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County, Robert Makemson, J.

Billy John Glover, Crestview, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's rule 3.850 motion which we treat as a 3.800 motion, asserting that his sentence as a violent career criminal, under section 775.084(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), is illegal because the statute was held unconstitutional in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999); The trial court denied relief, citing Freeman v. State, 616 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), however, Freeman, which applies to habitual offender sentences, is inapplicable to the violent career criminal sentence imposed here. Because appellant could not have been sentenced as a violent career criminal prior to the adoption of section 775.084(4)(c), and that statute was held unconstitutional, appellant is entitled to be resentenced. We therefore reverse.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Glover v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 8, 2002
816 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Glover v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLY JOHN GLOVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 8, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)