From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glinton v. Santa Clara Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
24-cv-00167 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00167 BLF (PR)

05-29-2024

EMANUEL EARL GLINTON, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Santa Clara County Jail, Elmwood Facility in Milpitas, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Santa Clara County Jail and the Santa Clara County Police Department. Dkt. No. 1. On April 5, 2024, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend to attempt to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 6. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days of the order, i.e., by May 3, 2024, and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action. Id. at 3. The matter has been reassigned to the undersigned. Dkt. Nos. 7, 8.

The deadline has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim.

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Glinton v. Santa Clara Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
24-cv-00167 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Glinton v. Santa Clara Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:EMANUEL EARL GLINTON, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00167 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)