From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glicenstein v. Fust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 28, 1963


In an action to recover damages for injury to property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 20, 1963, which (1) granted plaintiff's application to vacate a prior order of said court dismissing the action and to restore it to the General Calendar; and (2) directed the Calendar Clerk to restore the action to its regular place on the calendar. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellants have failed to submit a proper record as required by statute and rule (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 616; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 234; Whipple v. Ripson, 29 App. Div. 70; Matter of Gowdey, 101 App. Div. 275; Levine v. Carr, 11 A.D.2d 721; Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp., 11 A.D.2d 734). Beldock, P.J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Glicenstein v. Fust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Glicenstein v. Fust

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD GLICENSTEIN, Respondent, v. LILLIAN M. FUST et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

McKenzie v. Damazio

It is the appellant's obligation to prepare and submit a record on appeal that complies with the requirements…

McKenzie v. Damazio

It is the appellant's obligation to prepare and submit a record on appeal that complies with the requirements…