From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenn v. Worker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2015
C/A NO. 1:15-2896-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2015)

Opinion

C/A NO. 1:15-2896-CMC-SVH

08-31-2015

Andres Glenn, Plaintiff, v. Sheila Worker and Lester Simmons, Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's pro se complaint, filed in this court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (B)(2)(d), DSC, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges for pre-trial proceedings and a Report and Recommendation ("Report"). On August 12, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that this matter be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Plaintiff filed a letter in response to the Report on August 20, 2015.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

After conducting a de novo review as to objections made, and considering the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff's objections, the court agrees with the conclusion of the Report. Accordingly, the Report is adopted by reference in this Order.

Plaintiff's letter presents no argument or legal authority in response to the Report which might show that the Report errs in its legal or factual conclusions. Therefore, this matter is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Cameron McGowan Currie

CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Columbia, South Carolina
August 31, 2015


Summaries of

Glenn v. Worker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2015
C/A NO. 1:15-2896-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Glenn v. Worker

Case Details

Full title:Andres Glenn, Plaintiff, v. Sheila Worker and Lester Simmons, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2015

Citations

C/A NO. 1:15-2896-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2015)