Opinion
Case No. SC03-1803.
December 15, 2003.
Lower Tribunal No. 5D03-767.
The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10,11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
WELLS, PARIENTE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., would deny without prejudice.