From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gleich v. Naiburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The excuse proffered by the plaintiff for his failure to timely serve a note of issue — that his attorney had lost the case file — was insufficient to defeat the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute (see, CPLR 3215 [e]; Shu Chaing Chan v. Fendt, 187 A.D.2d 574; Papadopoulas v. R.B. Supply Corp., 152 A.D.2d 552). We additionally stress that the event which gave rise to this action occurred in 1979, that the action is more than 14 years old, and that no discovery has occurred since 1983 (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Seibert, 100 A.D.2d 562). Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gleich v. Naiburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Gleich v. Naiburg

Case Details

Full title:JEROME GLEICH, Appellant, v. DAVID NAIBURG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

The Lab, LLC v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am.

Dismissal of an action under CPLR § 3216 has been granted where a party abandons the litigation (see Maloney…