From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. Tercero

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2015
1:14-cv-02065-AWI- DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)

Opinion


RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, Plaintiff, v. J. TERCERO, Defendant. No. 1:14-cv-02065-AWI- DLB PC United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 28, 2015

          ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOCUMENT 7)

          DENNIS L. BECK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         Plaintiff Ronald George Glass (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 24, 2014.

         On January 12, 2015, the Court dismissed the action because Plaintiff’s removal was improper, and because Plaintiff has accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and did not meet the imminent danger requirement.

         On January 26, 2015, the Court received a motion for the appointment of counsel. As this action is closed, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Glass v. Tercero

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2015
1:14-cv-02065-AWI- DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Glass v. Tercero

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, Plaintiff, v. J. TERCERO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

1:14-cv-02065-AWI- DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)