From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jan 11, 2000
21 S.W.3d 852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED75740.

January 11, 2000.

Appeal from Missouri Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Hon. David L. Vincent, III, Judge.

Jennifer S. Walsh, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty.Gen., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty.Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst.Atty.Gen., Appeal Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.


ORDER


Melvin Glass, Movant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Glass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jan 11, 2000
21 S.W.3d 852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Glass v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN GLASS, MOVANT/APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Jan 11, 2000

Citations

21 S.W.3d 852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)