From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. Glass

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 884 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted February 13th, 1926.

Decided May 17th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

Mr. Merritt Lane and Messrs. Peck, Davis Gray, for the appellant.

Messrs. Tiffany, Brugler Wittreich ( Mr. G. Earle Brugler, of counsel), for the respondent.


We have examined with care the evidence in this case, in the light of the argument of counsel, and are satisfied that the decree is fully supported by the evidence and is right. The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Glass v. Glass

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 884 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Glass v. Glass

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. GLASS, petitioner-respondent, v. EUPHEMIA M. GLASS…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 17, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 884 (N.J. 1926)