From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glasburgh v. Port Auth. of N.Y. New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1995
213 A.D.2d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.).


Defendant Otis Elevator Company's noticed expert is also its employee and is therefore subject to deposition pursuant to CPLR 3101 (a) without restriction as to opinion testimony (McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear Throat Hosp., 15 N.Y.2d 20; Lingener v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 195 A.D.2d 838). The special circumstances requirement of CPLR 3101 (d) does not apply to an expert who is an employee of a party (see, Maser v. County of Onondaga, 90 A.D.2d 970, lv dismissed 58 N.Y.2d 1047).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Glasburgh v. Port Auth. of N.Y. New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1995
213 A.D.2d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Glasburgh v. Port Auth. of N.Y. New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:JAMES A. GLASBURGH, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, SUSAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 578

Citing Cases

Zambanini v. Otis Elevator Company

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.). Defendant's employee's extensive…

Snyder v. Deere & Co.

Plaintiff contends that the questions relate to matters of fact, not opinion, and, in any event, he is…