From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glanzman v. Schaffer

U.S.
Jun 23, 1958
357 U.S. 347 (1958)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 986.

Decided June 23, 1958.

Motion to substitute new party respondent denied as untimely.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss complaint as abated.

Reported below: 252 F.2d 333.

David T. Berman for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Roger Fisher and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.


The motion to dispense with the printing of the petition is granted. The motion to substitute Robert K. Christenberry, Acting Postmaster, New York, New York, as the party respondent in the place and stead of Robert H. Schaffer, resigned, is denied as untimely. Snyder v. Buck, 340 U.S. 15. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as abated.


Summaries of

Glanzman v. Schaffer

U.S.
Jun 23, 1958
357 U.S. 347 (1958)
Case details for

Glanzman v. Schaffer

Case Details

Full title:GLANZMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS GLANZMAN STUDIOS AND BOWERY ENTERPRISES, v …

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 23, 1958

Citations

357 U.S. 347 (1958)

Citing Cases

National Ass'n for the Advancement v. Acusport, Inc.

The court's discretionary right to empanel an advisory jury in an equitable action is codified in Federal…

United States Bio-Genics Corp. v. Christenberry

I know of no change from the provisions of that bill to the Administrative Procedure Act, as enacted, which…