From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gladu v. Waltz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jun 26, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS (D. Me. Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS

06-26-2019

NICHOLAS GLADU, Plaintiff v. GARY WALTZ, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 22, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 85). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 96) on June 10, 2019. The Defendants Josh Black, Casey Chadwick and Gary Waltz filed a Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 112) on June 24, 2019.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 59) is hereby DENIED.

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 26, 2019


Summaries of

Gladu v. Waltz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jun 26, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS (D. Me. Jun. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Gladu v. Waltz

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS GLADU, Plaintiff v. GARY WALTZ, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS (D. Me. Jun. 26, 2019)