From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G.K. Scott Co. v. Kross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1995
221 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


Petitioners John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian are individual registered representatives and are alleged to be "controlling persons" of G.K. Scott Co., in which appellants maintained retail brokerage accounts. Appellants commenced an arbitration proceeding against G.K. Scott and against John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian charging stock price manipulation in thinly traded issues, where Scott allegedly controlled the market by allegedly exercising prearranged trades and discouraging sales orders in issues sold by G.K. Scott to appellants. The demand for arbitration also names John Kevorkian and George Kevorkian as respondents on the ground that they are controlling persons under section 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. § 78t [a]), and are therefore subject to arbitration pursuant to section 12 (a) of the National Association of Securities Dealers Code of Arbitration Procedure. The Supreme Court granted the petition to stay arbitration on the ground that neither George Kevorkian nor John Kevorkian were directly involved in handling appellants' accounts. This was error. Based upon the prima facie showing in this record that George Kevorkian and John Kevorkian are "controlling persons" of G.K. Scott, and the allegations that appellants were injured by their allegedly fraudulent activities, George Kevorkian and John Kevorkian are proper parties to the arbitration ( see, McMahan Sec. Co. v Forum Capital Mkts., 35 F.3d 82 [2d Cir 1994]).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

G.K. Scott Co. v. Kross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1995
221 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

G.K. Scott Co. v. Kross

Case Details

Full title:G.K. SCOTT CO. et al., Respondents, v. SUSAN KROSS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 466

Citing Cases

Friedman v. Rittereiser

Although alleging that the various respondents had control over Michael Friedman, petitioner nevertheless…

Friedman v. Rittereiser

Although alleging that the various respondents had control over Michael Friedman, petitioner nevertheless…