From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giraldes v. Porter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 30, 2013
2:12-cv-00662 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)

Opinion


LARRY GIRALDES, Plaintiff, v. K. M. PORTER, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-00662 EFB United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division. May 30, 2013

          [PROPOSED] ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, District Judge.

         On May 21, 2013, Defendants Porter, Perry, Till, Scogin, Todd, Daley, Hutchings, O'Brien and Virga filed a request for extension of time to file a responsive pleading, explaining that all documentation necessary to determine how to proceed has not yet been received. Defendants further explained that additional time is necessary to prepare a responsive pleading.

         FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, Defendants are granted an extension of time, up to and including July 12, 2013, in which to file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Giraldes v. Porter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 30, 2013
2:12-cv-00662 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Giraldes v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:LARRY GIRALDES, Plaintiff, v. K. M. PORTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: May 30, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-00662 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)