From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginyard v. W. Fraser

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Jul 29, 2024
1:24-cv-1004 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 29, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-1004

07-29-2024

JERRY D. GINYARD PLAINTIFF v. WEST FRASER, INC. DEFENDANT


ORDER

Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff states he has reached a settlement with Defendant and that all issues in this matter are resolved. Plaintiff requests that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs.

Defendant did not sign onto Plaintiff's motion. Thus, the Court must consider the motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) instead of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Rule 41(a)(2) states that “an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Defendant has not responded in opposition to Plaintiff's motion, and the time to do so has passed.0F See Local Rule 7.2(b). Moreover, Defendant has not submitted to the Court any objection to Plaintiff's assertion of a settlement.

Plaintiff filed the instant motion on July 9, 2024. The fourteen (14) day period to respond under Local Rule 7.2(b) expired on July 23, 2024.

Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) should be and is hereby GRANTED. This matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side bearing their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ginyard v. W. Fraser

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Jul 29, 2024
1:24-cv-1004 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Ginyard v. W. Fraser

Case Details

Full title:JERRY D. GINYARD PLAINTIFF v. WEST FRASER, INC. DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 29, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-1004 (W.D. Ark. Jul. 29, 2024)