From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilpin v. Roosevelt Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 1, 2011
No. 11-CV-336 LH/LAM (D.N.M. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-336 LH/LAM

08-01-2011

JOY GILPIN, Plaintiff, v. ROOSEVELT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., Defendants.

Daniel R. Lindsey, Esq. John L. Collins, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Dickman, Esq. Attorney for Defendants Roosevelt County Sheriff's Office, Shawn Gore and Malin Parker Virginia Anderman, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Paul Nelson


STIPULATED ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon a Motion to Stay Discovery Based on Qualified Immunity filed by Defendants Gore and Parker (Doc. 29), and it appearing to the Court that Plaintiff does not oppose the motion based on Plaintiff's counsel's electronic approval below, and the Court having reviewed the motion and finding it to be well-taken, and being otherwise advised,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

The motion (Doc. 29) should be and hereby is GRANTED, and all discovery in the action should be and hereby is STAYED pending the District Court's resolution of the Motion for Qualified Immunity; provided, that Plaintiff may seek the Court's leave to conduct limited discovery in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) and the law governing qualified immunity.

The Court notes that Plaintiff filed a Motion to Defer Consideration of or Deny Defendants City of Clovis' and Nelson's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17), but counsel erroneously titled it as a "Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery" in the Court's CM-ECF docket. This motion appears to be a motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), which the Court understands would be for the presiding judge to decide in considering the pending Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LOURDES A. MARTÍNEZ

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SUBMITTED, STIPULATED AND AGREED BY: (Prior to modifications by the

Court)

Daniel R. Lindsey, Esq.

John L. Collins, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Michael Dickman, Esq.

Attorney for Defendants

Roosevelt County Sheriff's Office,

Shawn Gore and Malin Parker

Virginia Anderman, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Paul Nelson


Summaries of

Gilpin v. Roosevelt Cnty. Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 1, 2011
No. 11-CV-336 LH/LAM (D.N.M. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Gilpin v. Roosevelt Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:JOY GILPIN, Plaintiff, v. ROOSEVELT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

No. 11-CV-336 LH/LAM (D.N.M. Aug. 1, 2011)