From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilmore v. Wilshire Quinn Capital Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 1, 2024
23-cv-01640-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-01640-SK

07-01-2024

KEVIN E. GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. WILSHIRE QUINN CAPITAL INC, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Following four motions to dismiss, Plaintiff Kevin E. Gilmore, who is proceeding without an attorney, filed his fourth amended complaint on April 29, 2024. (Dkt. No. 47.) In response, Defendant Wilshire Quinn Capital Inc. filed a motion to strike certain substantive portions of that complaint. (Dkt. No. 48.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause, giving Plaintiff through June 24, 2024, to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 50.) As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has again failed to respond.

All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a federal magistrate judge. (Dkt. Nos. 4, 7.)

In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion to strike as moot (Dkt. No. 48) and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilmore v. Wilshire Quinn Capital Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 1, 2024
23-cv-01640-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Gilmore v. Wilshire Quinn Capital Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN E. GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. WILSHIRE QUINN CAPITAL INC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2024

Citations

23-cv-01640-SK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)