From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilmer v. T.R. Franklin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
NO. 3:10-0969 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3:10-0969

12-21-2012

MATTHEW GILMER v. T.R. FRANKLIN, INC., et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Motion of NDG Properites, Inc. To Reset Trial Date (Docket No. 113). The Motion is GRANTED.

This case is rescheduled for a jury trial on October 1, 2013, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The Pretrial Conference is RESCHEDULED for September 23, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. All lawyers who will participate in the trial must attend the pretrial conference.

Pretrial Filing Deadlines

Counsel shall submit a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order to the Court by September 16, 2013. The Pretrial Order shall contain: (1) a recitation that the pleadings are amended to conform to the Pretrial Order and that the Pretrial Order supplants the pleadings; (2) a statement of the basis for jurisdiction in this Court; (3) a short summary of the Plaintiff's theory (no more than one page); (4) a short summary of the Defendant's theory (no more than one page); (5) a statement of the issues, including a designation of which issues are for the jury and which are for the Court; (6) a succinct statement of the relief sought; (7) a summary of any anticipated evidentiary disputes; and (8) an estimate of the anticipated length of the trial.

The parties shall also submit to the Court, by September 16, 2013, the following:

(1) joint proposed jury instructions and verdict forms as follows: Counsel shall exchange proposed jury instructions on the substantive law of this specific case and proposed verdict forms and confer to reach agreement. Thereafter, counsel shall jointly prepare and file a set of agreed, proposed, case specific, jury instructions and verdict forms. Each proposed jury instruction shall include citations to supporting authorities. Counsel shall separately file any disputed jury instructions or verdict forms.

(2) witness lists, except for witnesses solely for impeachment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3);

(3) exhibit lists, except for documents solely for impeachment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); and

(4) any stipulations.

Motions in Limine and Objections to Experts

By September 9, 2013, the parties shall file any motions in limine and any motions objecting to expert testimony. Any responses to such motions shall be filed September 16, 2013.

Discovery

Expert witness disclosures shall be made timely, in accordance with Local Rule 39.01(c)(6)d. Supplemental responses to interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions shall be made timely in accordance with Local Rules 33.01(c), 34.01 and 36.01. Objections to the use of a deposition at trial shall be made timely in accordance with Local Rules 32.01(b) and 39.01(d)(1).The Court may exclude evidence, or order other sanctions, for violation of a duty or deadline to make or supplement expert witness disclosures or discovery responses.

Pretrial Conference

Counsel shall be prepared, at the Pretrial Conference, to:

(1) identify and discuss undisputed facts and issues;
(2) discuss the status of discovery;
(3) preview proposed testimony;
(4) discuss expert testimony;
(5) preview proposed exhibits;
(6) discuss motions in limine;
(7) discuss proposed jury instructions and verdict forms;
(8) discuss settlement; and
(9) discuss pretrial briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gilmer v. T.R. Franklin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
NO. 3:10-0969 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Gilmer v. T.R. Franklin, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW GILMER v. T.R. FRANKLIN, INC., et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

NO. 3:10-0969 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 21, 2012)