From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillette v. Smith

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 17, 2013
NO. 02-13-00219-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00219-CV

2013-10-17

DONALD GILLETTE APPELLANT v. JOHN SMITH AND EUNICE SMITH APPELLEES


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On September 18, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We further notified appellant that, in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c), this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court on or before September 30, 2013, a response reasonably explaining the failure to timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Gillette v. Smith

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Oct 17, 2013
NO. 02-13-00219-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Gillette v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:DONALD GILLETTE APPELLANT v. JOHN SMITH AND EUNICE SMITH APPELLEES

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Oct 17, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00219-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2013)