From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillett v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 25, 2000.

July 31, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated June 17, 1999, as granted the motion of defendants County of Westchester and the Westchester County Playland Commission for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Barr Rosenbaum, LLP, Spring Valley, N.Y. (Craig A. Post and Michael Nowicki of counsel), for appellants.

Alan D. Scheinkman, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Stacey Dolgin-Kmetz and Deborah A. Porder of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff William Gillett (hereinafter the plaintiff), an experienced skater, was injured while playing in an adult ice hockey league game at the Playland Park ice rink which is operated by the respondents. The plaintiff alleged that the ice was not properly maintained. However, his own deposition testimony indicated that he knew of the defects in the surface of the ice and nevertheless continued to skate. Under these circumstances, the doctrine of assumption of the risk mandates the granting of summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondents (see, Lo Piccolo v. Town of Oyster Bay, 260 A.D.2d 606; Byrne v. Westchester County, 178 A.D.2d 575, 578).


Summaries of

Gillett v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Gillett v. County of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GILLETT, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 496

Citing Cases

Wyzykowski v. State

hose risks that are not inherent ..., i.e., not ordinary and necessary in the sport" ( Lamey v. Foley, 188…

Wyzykowski v. State

Although the risk of falling while ice skating is " inherent in and arise[s] out of the nature of the sport…