From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillenwater v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 27, 2005
172 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85452.

September 27, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County; Kenneth Wayne Pratte, Judge.

Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.


ORDER


Michael Gillenwater ("movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because the record leaves the definite and firm impression that the plea court's acceptance of his guilty plea to first degree murder under section 565.020 RSMo (2000) violated his due process rights in that his guilty plea was not entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Gillenwater v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 27, 2005
172 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Gillenwater v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael GILLENWATER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

172 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)