From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillaspie v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 7, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH)

12-07-2018

ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # C35470, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARD, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the motion under F.R. CIV. P. 59 (docket entry 37), is DENIED. The plaintiff's objection (docket entry 36) is OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED. December 7, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gillaspie v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 7, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Gillaspie v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # C35470, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARD, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2018)