From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillaspie v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 2, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH)

10-02-2018

ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # C35470, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARD, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

By separate judgment, the claims against defendants Robert Ward, Trey Brown, David Vernon, and Lisa Powell will be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous until the plaintiff satisfies the conditions in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

SO ORDERED. October 2, 2018.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gillaspie v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 2, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Gillaspie v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # C35470, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARD, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 2, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2765-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2018)