Gillaspie v. Toro

Full title: CRISTINA GILLASPIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 22, 2023

No. 22-1977 (4th Cir. May. 22, 2023)

Opinion

22-1977

05-22-2023

CRISTINA GILLASPIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.

Allan R. Holmes, Timothy O. Lewis, Rebecca J. Wolfe, GIBBS &HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Adair F. Boroughs, United States Attorney, William H. Jordan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 18, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00453-DCN)

ON BRIEF:

Allan R. Holmes, Timothy O. Lewis, Rebecca J. Wolfe, GIBBS &HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Adair F. Boroughs, United States Attorney, William H. Jordan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Cristina Gillaspie appeals the district court's orders (1) accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant the Secretary of the Navy summary judgment on Gillaspie's discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, as applied through § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l; and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634; and (2) denying Gillaspie's Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See Gillaspie v. Del Toro, No. 2:19-cv-00453-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2022; Aug. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED