Summary
holding that a missed deadline in a federal case was not sufficient to demonstrate actual injury
Summary of this case from Cisnevas-Garcia v. ShipmanOpinion
9:03-cv-1537 (TJM/RFT).
April 5, 2007
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff filed suit against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants brought a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).
No objections to the February 20, 2007 Report-Recommendation have been raised. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein and GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES the petition as to the John Doe respondents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.