Opinion
Civil Action 4:20-CV-93-SA-RP
07-12-2021
JOE WILLIS GILES PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT
ORDER
SHARI ON AYCOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On May 20, 2021, United States Magistrate Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation [27] in this cause. The R&R concludes that “the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed.” [27], p. 1. The R&R set forth a time period of fourteen days for the parties to object to the R&R, if they chose to do so. No objections have been filed, and the deadline has now passed.
“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)).
The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED IN FULL as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision is hereby AFFIRMED. This CASE is CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.