Summary
In Giles v. Maryland, 372 U.S. 767, 83 S.Ct. 1102, 10 L.Ed.2d 137 (1963), the Court dismissed an appeal, which raised this issue along with others, for want of a substantial federal question.
Summary of this case from Wyley v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryOpinion
No. 834.
Decided April 22, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 229 Md. 370, 183 A.2d 359.
Hal Witt and Richard J. Scupi for appellants.
Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Russell R. Reno, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
James H. Heller and Lawrence Speiser for the National Capital Area Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.