From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giles v. Garwood

U.S.
Feb 21, 1989
489 U.S. 1030 (1989)

Summary

holding that ordering restitution “is not denied to the district court because a defendant must also forfeit the proceeds of illegal activity”

Summary of this case from United States v. Kirby

Opinion

No. 88-6235.

February 21, 1989, October TERM, 1988.


C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 853 F. 2d 876.


Summaries of

Giles v. Garwood

U.S.
Feb 21, 1989
489 U.S. 1030 (1989)

holding that ordering restitution “is not denied to the district court because a defendant must also forfeit the proceeds of illegal activity”

Summary of this case from United States v. Kirby

holding that a RICO enterprise may consist of individuals associated in fact with corporations

Summary of this case from DeWit v. Firstar Corp.

finding no meaningful distinction between seizure made under state RICO law and state obscenity statute

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Calif. Publishers Liquidat.

requiring separate jury instructions, deliberations and closing arguments for forfeiture after guilt phase, but declining to require evidentiary hearings in all cases

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Elgersma
Case details for

Giles v. Garwood

Case Details

Full title:GILES v. GARWOOD ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

489 U.S. 1030 (1989)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Calif. Publishers Liquidat.

The Government cannot avail itself of the benefits of the RICO forfeiture statute when it chooses not to…

Webster v. Omnitrition Intern., Inc.

The participation of a corporation in a racketeering scheme is sufficient, of itself, to give the enterprise…