From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilcrease v. Prator

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Jun 17, 2022
Civil Action 20-cv-1322 (W.D. La. Jun. 17, 2022)

Summary

dismissing claim that deputies listened to plaintiff's phone calls

Summary of this case from Houston v. LeBlanc

Opinion

Civil Action 20-cv-1322

06-17-2022

JOHN EDWARD GILCREASE, SR v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL


HICKS, CHIEF JUDGE

JUDGMENT

HORNSBY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, including the written objections filed (Record Document 45), and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

It is ordered that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 29) is GRANTED and that all claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 17th day of June, 2022.


Summaries of

Gilcrease v. Prator

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Jun 17, 2022
Civil Action 20-cv-1322 (W.D. La. Jun. 17, 2022)

dismissing claim that deputies listened to plaintiff's phone calls

Summary of this case from Houston v. LeBlanc
Case details for

Gilcrease v. Prator

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD GILCREASE, SR v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-cv-1322 (W.D. La. Jun. 17, 2022)

Citing Cases

Houston v. LeBlanc

To the extent Houston's Complaint is genuinely about officers listening in on his phone call, he has not…