From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-cv-01841-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01841-JCM-PAL

03-19-2013

ERIC GILBERT; on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant.

Respectfully Submitted, THIERMAN LAW FIRM Joshua Buck Attorney for Plaintiff Respectfully Submitted, SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Thomas R. Kaufman Attorney for Defendant


Mark R. Thierman, NV SBN 8285
laborlawyer® pacbell.com
Jason J. Kuller, NV SBN 12244
jason@thiermanlaw.com
Joshua D. Buck, NV SBN 12187
josh@thiermanlaw.com
THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Tel. (775) 284-1500
Fax. (775) 284-1506
Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIC GILBERT

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Eric Gilbert ("Plaintiff" or "Gilbert"), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed his class and collective action complaint for unpaid overtime on June 10, 2011 ("Action");

WHEREAS this Action was conditionally certified as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") on August 9, 2012, and notices of the action were sent out to other similarly situated pursuant to this Court's Order (Doc. 48);

WHEREAS this Action was never certified as a class action;

WHEREAS only four (4) other similarly situated individuals opted into the Action besides Gilbert;

WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to resolve the Action as to all opt-in plaintiffs who have decided not to withdraw their consent to sue;

Opt-in plaintiff Wayne Jeu has withdrawn his consent to sue in this Action.

WHEREAS the payments under the settlement are based (1) on length of service during the 2-year statute of limitations from the date the plaintiff filed his or her consent to sue and (2) the amount of weekly overtime alleged to have been worked over that time period;

WHEREAS the payments under the settlement are as follows:

1. Gilbert will receive $22,500 under the settlement. Out of the $22,500 gross amount, $15,000 represents an enhancement payment for asserting the Action as the named-Plaintiff and $7,500 represents the wage payment. In consideration his settlement amount, Gilbert signed a general release of claims against Defendant.
2. Tim Brines will receive $3,250 under the settlement. Mr. Brines only released claims alleged in the Action relating to unpaid overtime and his exempt status.
3. Phillip Ostlie will receive $1,750 under the settlement. Mr. Ostlie only released claims alleged in the Action relating to unpaid overtime and his exempt status.
4. Tammy Jelinek will receive $500 under the settlement. Ms. Jelinek's claims fell outside the two-year statute of limitations. Ms. Jelinek only released claims alleged in the Action relating to unpaid overtime and her exempt status.

WHEREAS the settlement further provides for a payment of attorneys fees and costs to the Thierman Law Firm in the amount of $27,000;

WHEREAS Gilbert and each individual opt-in plaintiff has separately signed and assented to the settlement;

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the settlement represents a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute and that this Action be dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys fees.

Respectfully Submitted,

THIERMAN LAW FIRM

______________

Joshua Buck

Attorney for Plaintiff

Respectfully Submitted,

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &

HAMPTON LLP

______________

Thomas R. Kaufman

Attorney for Defendant
ERIC GILBERT; on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant.

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01841-JCM-PAL


ORDER

The Court hereby GRANTS the Parties stipulation of dismissal. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED

______________

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

JAMES C. MAHAN


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-cv-01841-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC GILBERT; on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01841-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2013)