From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Tang

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 29, 2022
1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB

04-29-2022

ARREN GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. HHIENG TANG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 13)

On April 28, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 13.) The parties seek to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the complaint thirty days, to May 23, 2022. (Id.) The parties proffer they have been engaged in settlement discussions and the extension facilitates their attempts to resolve this matter. The parties further assert the extension need not affect the date of the scheduling conference, which is currently set for May 31, 2022. The Court finds good cause exists to grant the stipulated request.

Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to the complaint on or before May 23, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Tang

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 29, 2022
1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Tang

Case Details

Full title:ARREN GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. HHIENG TANG, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 29, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2022)