From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Rorick

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 25, 1932
186 N.E. 90 (Ohio 1932)

Opinion

No. 23239

Decided May 25, 1932.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Weight or sufficiency of evidence.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.

Messrs. Kirkbride, Boesel, Frease Cole, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Fraser, Hiett, Wall Effler, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed by virtue of Rule XIX of this Court, the Court finding that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, reversing that of the common pleas, was based, at least partly, on the ground that the judgment was not sustained by sufficient evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Rorick

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 25, 1932
186 N.E. 90 (Ohio 1932)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Rorick

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT v. RORICK ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 25, 1932

Citations

186 N.E. 90 (Ohio 1932)
186 N.E. 90

Citing Cases

Corman Aircraft Corporation v. Weihmiller

ort to cover or affect any other cause for termination which might exist or develop. It would be quite…