From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation Correction

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 19, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-13, Original Case No. 2:04-cv-660 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-13, Original Case No. 2:04-cv-660.

January 19, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's October 5, 2005 Report and Recommendation recommending that defendants Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, ("ODRC"), Correction Reception Center, Donna Day, George Smith, and Jacqueline Foster's June 15, 2005 motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint (doc. 33 in case # 2:04-cv-13 and doc. 31 in case # 2:04-cv-660) be granted. No objections have been filed.

Upon de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the October 5, 2005 Report and Recommendation (doc. 48). Defendants' June 15, 2005 motion to dismiss (doc. 33 in case # 2:04-cv-13 and doc. 31 in case # 2:04-cv-660) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for the defendants Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, ("ODRC"), Correction Reception Center, Donna Day, George Smith, and Jacqueline Foster.

OSCEA AFSCME Local 11 remains a defendant.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation Correction

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 19, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cv-13, Original Case No. 2:04-cv-660 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation Correction

Case Details

Full title:Michael S. Gilbert, Plaintiff, v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation Correction…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 19, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cv-13, Original Case No. 2:04-cv-660 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2006)