From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Donald

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Jul 19, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-021 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 19, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-021.

July 19, 2007


ORDER


After an independent review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. Through this same pleading, Plaintiff seeks to amend his Complaint so that Defendant Fowler is the only Defendant named in his cause of action. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Complaint is DENIED.

In his Objections, Plaintiff asserts there is evidence to support his contention that Defendant Fowler administered the incorrect or improper medical treatment with deliberate indifference. Plaintiff also asserts Defendant Fowler failed to take pictures of his injuries. As noted by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's allegations amount to nothing more than medical malpractice or negligence and do not set forth any constitutional violations.

Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Donald

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division
Jul 19, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-021 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Donald

Case Details

Full title:RANDY O'NEAL GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES E. DONALD, Commissioner; CALVIN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV507-021 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 19, 2007)