From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gidge v. Security Realty Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jun 1, 1964
199 N.E.2d 518 (Mass. 1964)

Opinion

June 1, 1964.

Mack M. Roberts for the plaintiff.

Frederick S. Pillsbury for the defendant Security Realty Company.

Earl H. Wright for the defendant Otis Elevator Company.


Exceptions overruled. There was no error in directing a verdict for each defendant. The plaintiff's injuries occurred on January 27, 1959, about 8:20 P.M. as a result of his fall into the elevator shaft of the office building in which he had desk space with a tenant. The plaintiff testified that the corridor was dark and that he opened the unattended elevator shaft door by inserting a rod through a small hole and moving the handle of the lock bar. He had done this for years, on frequent visits "after hours," having learned of the rod and its use from observing another person thus enter and use the elevator. He also testified that just as he opened the door his attention was caught by a siren in the street and that he then turned and fell. At best for the plaintiff, he assumed the elevator was there because of his observation of the light conditions in the shaft prior to his opening the door and his prior experience of always finding the elevator there upon opening the door. This assumption could not overcome the necessary conclusion that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care in failing to look before he stepped. Gambardello v. H.J. Seiler Co. 335 Mass. 49. Hultberg v. Truex, 344 Mass. 414, 418-419. The plaintiff's case would have been no stronger with the excluded photograph or his excluded testimony that he believed the door would not open if the elevator was not in place. The basis for this belief had already been shown.


Summaries of

Gidge v. Security Realty Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jun 1, 1964
199 N.E.2d 518 (Mass. 1964)
Case details for

Gidge v. Security Realty Company

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE F. GIDGE vs. SECURITY REALTY COMPANY another

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jun 1, 1964

Citations

199 N.E.2d 518 (Mass. 1964)
347 Mass. 779

Citing Cases

Walton v. Hoffman

We rule that the evidence required a finding that the plaintiffs were contributorily negligent. Herman v.…

Goldstein v. Gontarz

And considering how sudden was the backward lurch of the truck, any fault of the plaintiff could be found to…