Opinion
22-6057
04-29-2022
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 26, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00959-GJH)
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Warren Matthew Giddings appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giddings v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 1:21-cv-00959-GJH (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED