From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Widman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1905
106 App. Div. 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Opinion

July, 1905.

Ralph Wolf, for the appellant.

William W. Wingate, for the respondent.

Present — O'BRIEN, P.J., PATTERSON, INGRAHAM, McLAUGHLIN and HATCH, JJ.


This action being for an accounting, a reference to hear and determine the issues cannot be ordered prior to the entry of an interlocutory judgment providing for an accounting. If the parties are entitled to such an interlocutory judgment upon the pleadings, that relief can be granted by motion and a proper interlocutory judgment entered. An accounting may then be taken before a referee.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Gibson v. Widman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1905
106 App. Div. 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Case details for

Gibson v. Widman

Case Details

Full title:MAY M. GIBSON, Respondent, v . EMIL ALBERT WIDMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1905

Citations

106 App. Div. 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
94 N.Y.S. 593

Citing Cases

London v. Meryash

Assuming, without deciding, that this is so, the order cannot be sustained. The proper practice in such case…